举出第二种可能性。Strengthen原结论的.It also might be the case that SMILEBRIGHT users tend to be the kind of people who are excessively concerned with the appearance of their teeth, perhaps theyre actors, and so are the kind of people who might, sooner or later, want to have their teeth capped anyway.举出第三种可能。论证方法为加条件后讨论,讨论采用三段式。考试大的美女编辑们
In conclusion, the argument, while it seems logocal at first, has several flaws as discussed above. 这句话很经典,摸版性很强。 The argument could be improved by providing evidence that the correlation is indeed a causal relationship -- that using the toothpaste actually causes the need for capped teeth.
给出第一条建议是针对没有因果关系的那段的。It could be further improved by ruling out alternative explanations for the supposed causal relationship.给出的第二条建议是针对因果关系中提供他因的那段。总的来看,这里的提建议的方式以及位置都和和北美范文很像。最后,我们发现这文章所指出的逻辑错误都是大错误,那种脊梁骨似的错误,而对于小错误,比如他们report则不予讨论,看得出来,官方的意思是,无论什么文章,都最优先挑核心逻辑链中的重点错误,小错误能挑出来更好,但没有也没关系,前提是大错误都挑出来了并且论证充分。本文与前面的文章的差别之处就在于,很难找到文章的中心思想,只是罗列了错误并独立的分析,过于平淡,而没有对于文章的核心错误的把握。
【GRE写作argument全部官方范文分析(8)】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01