Finally, it is important to remember that people rarely trust movie reviewers.第三个需要考虑的就是人们的信任问题。这里通过论证使得最后推导出中心观点的后半句话,至此全文的逻辑链论证就比较完善了。
For that reason, it is important that the films appeal to the populus, and not critics alone.The best advertisement in many cases is word of mouth.No matter what critics say, people tend to take the opinions of friends more seriously.This supports continual funding to produce quality movies that will appeal to the average person.最后通过三段论的演绎,使得广告效应逐渐向拿出钱真正搞点好电影这个观点上过渡。我认为这是全文的亮点。触及到了事物的本质的改变才是最有意义的,使得在前两段的论证的基础上,通过本文的论证使得讨论更加的深入,更加的务实。
There is no reason that silver screen should not spend more on advertisement, however, there is reason to continue to invest in diverse, quality films. 本文的满分的另一个有利保障就是最后一段的精准的概括,可以说,最后一段总结了全文的态度,使得考官看完最后一段能迅速找到全文的论证核心。这是有必要的 Furthermore, the company must consider carefully what it chooses to emphasize in its advertisement.这一段同时给出了建议改进方案。最后,本文实在是相当的短,之所以这么短,是因为省去了开头复述原题,省去了单列一段质疑让步的假设,比如说这里的让步是广告是有用的,所以就要质疑在什么时候是有用的,如果再加上这样一段外加演绎的话就会更好。同样,这篇文章语言十分的简洁,基本上没有废话,没有所谓的亮点词句,这也许是给我们的启发,告诉我们更应该关注什么:立论点以及安排方式以及论证方式。这三个论点的安排是:市场规模==〉人民生活标准==〉人不相信评论家==〉人对于质量的要求,顺序是从外在条件到内在条件。
【GRE写作优秀素材整理】相关文章:
最新
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01
2016-03-01