中国政法大学一婚姻法博士接受成都商报记者采访时对这一条持赞成态度。她认为这符合物权法物权变动的基本法理;同时照顾到了目前婚姻纠纷中房产纠纷较多的现实,为法官提供了一个极具操作性的条文。
那么广大网友对新婚姻法的司法解释又有什么意见呢?
Oppose:(反对方意见)
“Favors” men, protects the more powerful party
让更多男人受益,这是保护有权有势群体的利益
“How can the new Marriage Law be this harsh towards women? The male chauvinism is too serious!” Netizen Chen Di expressed her view through her microblog, and the number of netizens who shared her opinion were not the minority, with many female netizens believing “this sweeps aside the last obstacle against men being unfaithful” and “will cause the divorce rate to go up”. Netizen “Ling Mei” says: “I’ve always believe that there are more unfaithful men than women who cheat men out of their assets, and women devote more than men in the family. (The new Marriage Law) might as well add another article: Whoever the house belongs to is whoever should clean it!” Netizen “寞 香” was even more realistic and blunt: “What woman who doesn’t already have a house will now dare to give birth to a child? After giving birth, if the man cheats on her, wouldn’t she end up sleeping in the streets with her child!” The new Marriage Law has not only enraged women, some male netizens have also expressed “a lot of pressure”. Netizen Yuan Datuo believes: The new Marriage Law may actually lead to — if the house isn’t put under the woman’s name, the woman will refuse to get married, and as a result the man must pay an even higher price for marriage. “If you look at it from the other side, if the parents-in-law buy a house, then the son-in-law also won’t have a stake/claim, right?”
【“新婚姻法”颁司法解释 父母给儿买房没有儿媳份】相关文章:
★ “车厘子自由”已经out了!今天,你实现“香椿自由”了吗?
★ 自己给自己的恩赐
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15