Mr. Block is on shakier ground when he says such noncash gains are driving Olam's capital spending, with management deliberately buying poor assets to revalue upward, for instance. It isn't clear why the company would do this rather than, say, spend funds on productive assets.
布洛克的指控较为站不住脚的一点是,他说这类非现金所得推动了奥兰的资本支出,比如管理层故意买进不良资产以便重新向上调整估值。不清楚该公司为什么要这样做,而不是将资金花在能创造价值的资产上。
Muddy Waters' blockbusters are typically long on speculation, and short on certainty. The Olam tome is no different. Still, just the possibility Mr. Block is right has been enough to spook investors, customers, suppliers and bondholders of companies targeted in the past.
浑水公司的指控通常是猜测成分多而确定成分少,对奥兰的指控也是如此。尽管如此,布洛克有可能是对的,仅凭这一点可能性就足以令以往遭攻击的公司的投资者、客户、供应商和债券持有者人心惶惶。
【浑水质疑奥兰国际灰色会计做法】相关文章:
★ 科技资讯阅读:iPad3和iPhone5将面世(中英对照)
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15