但是后来，这对情侣开始经常因为钱而争吵，并在4个月后他们分开了，DiPierro 如是说。她在纽约州史德顿岛做一名医生助理。

The followingspring, he filed a lawsuit.

第二年春天的时候，他提起了诉讼。

Reinhold and his attorney did not respond to requests for comment.

Reinhold和他的律师没有回应记者的置评请求。

Poll: Who do you think should keep the ring?

投票：你认为谁应该保有这枚戒指呢？

According to DiPierro, she held onto the ring because he hadn't repaid her for his share of $40,000 worth of living expenses.

DiPierro声称她不愿意还回戒指，是因为男方没有偿还他应付的价值4万美元的生活开销。

Their deal: she had paid for rent, food, car payments and other bills while Reinhold saved for the ring.

他们的约定：她支付房租、食物、车贷和其他账单，而Reinhold则攒钱买戒指。

"I helped him save so I felt that I was holding onto the ring for collateral," she said.

"我帮助了他存钱，所以我觉得有必要保留戒指作为抵偿，”她说。

Laws vary by state, but many consider the ring a "conditional gift" until the couple says "I do," -- meaning that regardless of who gets cold feet, the ring must be returned to the person who bought it, said Alton Abramowitz, a New York-based attorney and president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.

【婚礼取消了！订婚戒指归谁所有？】相关文章：

★ 7月1日起新西兰游客税启动！每人160元

★ 人造肉势不可挡，领头品牌Beyond Meat股价飙升

★ 霉霉近期频繁出入录音棚，可能要出新专辑

★ 苹果在欧洲又踩大坑了，被欧盟立案调查

★ 订婚半年不到，ladygaga又取消婚约！咋回事？

★ 这个售价650美元的“思考箱”在推特上火了！里面都有啥？

★ 在哪些地方花钱纯属浪费?

★ 天才! 美国少年同时获颁高中文凭和哈佛大学学位

★ 比伯婚礼或将在3月举办？

★ Gucci推出迪士尼合作款包包，画风不忍直视