但独立的董事长角色应该成为上市公司或计划更换领导层的公司的模板。这种角色并不难理解——非执行董事长掌管董事会,而CEO管理企业——但公司必须定期解释这种角色。美国公司的董事长往往利用其职位来行使他们未充分行使的执行权力。
The biggest problem in the US, however, is that the debate about which model to choose frequently turns into a test of machismo, in which activist investors vie to strip the chairman’s epaulettes from the humiliated executive’s shoulders. Splitting the roles is no panacea, but as long as the boss thinks of it as cruel and unusual punishment, directors will have an excuse to leave a vital tool of good governance in its box.
然而,美国最大的问题在于,围绕选择哪种模式的辩论往往会演变成一场“全武行”——维权投资者恨不得一脚把CEO从董事长职位上踹下去。分离这两个职位并非万灵药,但只要CEO认为分离是一个无情且非同寻常的惩罚措施,董事们就有理由暂不启用这个通往良好治理的关键工具。
【权势之争:董事长与CEO之间的种种】相关文章:
★ 真人脱毛、吃零食……盘点电影中那些不按剧本出牌的“神操作”
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15