Others see it as a sign of meddling in the industry. "Proponents of a kill switch know nothing about how technology works," says Robert Siciliano, a McAfee Online Security expert. "Whatever kill switch is implemented, will be hack-able and rendered useless by anyone with ill intent."

也有人认为这项法案显示出干预行业正常发展的迹象。迈克菲在线安全专家罗伯特o西西里亚诺指出：“支持‘自杀开关’的人根本不知道科技是怎样运作的。只要犯罪分子怀有恶意，不管你用什么样的自杀开关，都是可以破解的，最终只会形同虚设。”

Software-only based approaches have the potential to backfire. For one, they can be worked around by clever thieves. "If someone steals a phone, there are ways to block it from receiving communications that would kill a device," says Greg Kazmierczak, CTO of Wave Systems, a provider of hardware-based encryption technology. For instance, a thief could place the stolen phone in a signal-blocking phone case that would prevent all electromagnetic communications from reaching the device. According to Kazmierczak, it could be possible to put it into one of those cases and perform whatever you need to in order to stop the kill signal from coming in.

纯粹依靠软件的技术手段必然有可以动手脚的空间，因而也必然会被聪明的小偷利用。基于硬件的加密技术提供商Wave Systems技术总监格雷格o卡兹米耶尔扎克说：“如果有人偷了一部手机，那就有办法阻止它从外部接收自毁指令。”比如小偷只要把偷来的手机放在一个能阻绝无线信号的手机壳里，就能阻断这部手机的所有电磁通讯。据卡兹米耶尔扎克表示，将被盗手机放在这种手机壳里，然后再进行各种阻断接受自杀信号的操作，的确具有可能性。

【自杀开关 难道是手机防盗终极大招?】相关文章：

★ 移民潮下的“人才浪费”

★ 吃胡萝卜真的可以增强夜视能力?

★ 吃霸王餐吗？用谢谢付账的那种

★ 美国大学生就业职场出现的新变化

★ Facebook的股东希望扎克伯格下台

★ 《生活大爆炸》即将落幕 大结局精彩看点抢鲜知

★ 今天会是美好的一天

★ Instagram推出网购功能，冲动消费从未如此方便

★ 将环保进行到底 东京奥运会领奖台将由回收塑料垃圾制成

★ “基地”占领也门南部城市宣称建国