A schema is sort your organized representation of the world. When something fits into your view of the world, you’re primed to absorb that information. If it’s mildly inconsistent, it sort of stands and becomes memorable. But if it’s too inconsistent then it slips away. In terms of groups talking together, studies suggest that false memories are more likely to arise in a group discussion than individually because there is more chance of somebody offering a false memory which can then be implanted. However, if somebody in the group says “no that’s not true”, that will mitigate the influence. But for groups with a strong shared interest, like Trump supporters, they’re less likely to dispute one another and therefore it’s less likely for their memories to be updated.
模式就是你对世界有条理的看法。某件事符合你的世界观时,你就容易接受这一信息。如果有一点点不符,你就有些抗拒,记忆会变得难忘。但如果相去甚远,这个记忆就会消失。再说说群体聊天,研究表明群体聊天比个人谈话更容易产生错误记忆,因为你更可能被灌输别人提供的错误记忆。然而,如果人群中有人说:“不,那不是真的”,你所受的影响会降低。但对于有着强烈共同兴趣的群体而言,比如特朗普的支持者们,他们就不太可能怀疑彼此,因此他们不大可能会更新记忆。
From all the evidence, memory is not like a tape recorder. There’s not really a “truth” to memory. What Frederic Bartlett said is that memory is a continuous reconstruction. And what guides your reconstruction? Your view of the world. Your current view of the world, your current attitudes, allow you to reconstruct your own past to be consistent with your present self. We’re constantly reshaping our memory to essentially reinforce our present attitudes.
【谎言重复一百遍,是不是自己也会信?】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15