Increasing taxes on the wealthy will harm economic growth: This argument is made frequently, along with the claim that increasing growth will lift all boats, but the evidence doesn't support either claim. As Nobel Prize-winning economist Peter Diamond and John Bates Clark medalist Emmanuel Saez have noted, since the 1970s no clear correlation exists between economic growth and top tax-rate cuts across Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries.
对富人增税将损害经济增长:这种说法我们经常能听到,与此说法一起出现的还有经济的持续增长将会让所有人的财富都随之水涨船高,然而现有证据都不支持以上两种说法。诺贝尔经济学奖得主Peter Diamond和约翰·贝茨·克拉克奖得主Emmanuel Saez曾指出,20世纪70年代以来,在经济合作与发展组织(OECD)各成员国内,经济增长与最高税率削减之间并无明显关联。
As for the trickle-down argument, this claim falls apart when you examine what happened to the distribution of income after tax cuts for the wealthy enacted during the Bush administration. Income of those at the top went up substantially, with no corresponding gain for those lower in the income distribution.
至于“涓滴效应”的理论,当你回头审视Bush政府所推行的减税政策对收入分配的影响之后,会发现这一主张根本站不住脚。顶层人士的收入大幅增加,与此同时低收入人群的收入水平却并未出现相应的增长。
【向富人增税 对经济增长是利是弊】相关文章:
★ 这个售价650美元的“思考箱”在推特上火了!里面都有啥?
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15