对瑞安的另外一个公正、但在某种程度上与上述批评矛盾的批评是,虽然他可能是艾茵·兰德(Ayn Rand)的崇拜者,但与其说他是以改革者的身份参与竞选,还不如说他是共和党的雇佣文人。在国会,他为自己所在的威斯康辛选区寻求联邦基金,支持小布什(George W.?Bush)时期臭名昭著的开支计划,比如联邦医疗保险中的处方药计划。虽然他自称为赤字鹰派人物,但却没有支持辛普森-鲍尔斯(Simpson-Bowles)赤字削减委员会的报告,而他还是该委员会的成员。
Yet Mr Ryan is neither the heartless ideologue nor the humbug liberal critics have made him out to be. He is, rather, a conviction politician who has moved his party far more than it has moved him. Getting the House to pass his budget this year – thus putting the GOP on record in favour of ending Medicare as an entitlement – was a stunning accomplishment. It puts an end to the Republican attempt to have it both ways, calling for less government in theory while voting for more in practice. It puts the onus on Democrats to say how else they would restrain a programme that is growing to consume the entire federal budget.
然而,瑞安既不是一个无情的空想家,也不是自由派批评者所说的骗子。他是一个有信念的政治人物,对其党派的影响远远超过了党派对他的影响。他今年成功地让众议院通过了他的预算案,从而让共和党公开支持结束联邦医疗保险这一福利,这是一项惊人的成就。它让共和党无法再见风使舵,一面在理论上呼吁小政府,但实际上却支持大政府。它还把责任推到了民主党头上——民主党需要回答,还有什么其他措施能限制一个不断扩大、势要消耗整个联邦预算的项目。
【罗姆尼的竞选搭档救不了他】相关文章:
★ 美国大选与金价
★ 时尚圈的博主们
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15