还是看下范文：

　　题目

　　It is unfortunate that todays educators place so much emphasis on finding out what students want to include in the curriculum and then giving it to them. It is the educators duty to determine the curriculum and the students duty to study what is presented to them.

　　As an elementary educator, I believe this stance is extremist. Educators and the public must come to a middle road. The high road and the low road are intimated in this statement. I believe the high road on this topic represents a nouveau approach. Ask the students what they want to learn and study for the year; then meander, research and branch off of their interests. The low road on this topic is old fashioned and outdated. The assumptions behind this view include a magical ability by teachers to infuse reams of information, data and knowledge into students brains that then become internalized and applied by the students.

　　这里作者的开头有些长，不推荐，不过他很有效的把全文的观点归纳为两个方面，即一边不好，另一边也不好，从本质上讲这个开头和上一篇范文的开头很象，但提出了分论点并说明了理由，这样后文再写就能很好的照应。当然这个开头确实有些沉冗了，建议大家写的时候能再概括些，只是用一两个关键词表明自己分论点的出发点即可。

　　再来看篇5分范文：

【GRE issue写作：首段写作技巧】相关文章：

★ 2011gre issue写作优秀实例：更新领导保持活力

★ GRE写作范文：思想家

★ gre issue写作优秀实例：意见同与不同

★ GRE写作AW三阶段备考攻略

★ 2011gre issue写作优秀实例：道德与法律

★ GRE写作：学会“让步式攻击”

★ 2011gre issue写作优秀实例：研究历史的好处

★ gre issue写作提纲思路与分析28

★ 2011gre issue写作优秀实例：政治领袖

★ gre issue写作优秀实例：触类旁通