Third, in applying religious values, we must respect the integrity of public debate.

In that debate, faith is no substitute for facts. Critics may oppose the nuclear freeze for what they regard as moral reasons. They have every right to argue that any negotiation with the Soviets is wrong, or that any accommodation with them sanctions their crimes, or that no agreement can be good enough and therefore all agreements only increase the chance of war. I do not believe that, but it surely does not violate the standard of fair public debate to say it. What does violate that standard, what the opponents of the nuclear freeze have no right to do, is to assume that they are infallible, and so any argument against the freeze will do, whether it is false or true.

The nuclear freeze proposal is not unilateral, but bilateral -- with equal restraints on the United States and the Soviet Union. The nuclear freeze does not require that we trust the Russians, but demands full and effective verification. The nuclear freeze does not concede a Soviet lead in nuclear weapons, but recognizes that human beings in each great power already have in their fallible hands the overwhelming capacity to remake into a pile of radioactive rubble the earth which God has made.

There is no morality in the mushroom cloud. The black rain of nuclear ashes will fall alike on the just and the unjust. And then it will be too late to wish that we had done the real work of this atomic age -- which is to seek a world that is neither red nor dead.

【美国经典英文演讲100篇:＂Truth and Tolerance in America＂】相关文章：

★ 温总理剑桥大学演讲对译稿（上）

★ 美国经典英文演讲100篇:1992 DNC Address

★ 演讲好比考试

★ 克林顿在香港关于美国亚太地区政策的演讲口译3

★ 香港特首曾荫权智经研究中心领袖论坛致辞（2）

★ 美国经典英文演讲100篇:＂Chappaquiddick＂

★ 美国驻中华人民共和国大使骆家辉在大使官邸媒体见面会的讲话

★ 克林顿在香港关于美国亚太地区政策的演讲口译10

★ 第26届世界大学生夏季运动会组织委员会副主席王荣致辞

★ 美国经典英文演讲100篇:＂Religious Belief and Public Morality＂