美国知名网络杂志Slate的一位作者称邮报刊登裸照“毫无意义”，所有的说辞都“无法让人接受这样的头版”。

She opined:

她这样说道：

"A woman should be able to agree to take naked photos for a European magazine in her twenties with the expectation that they will not show up on the cover of a newspaper/tabloid some 20 years later under the headline "Ogle Office" when her husband decides to run for president."

“当梅拉尼娅在20多岁同意为一家欧洲杂志拍摄裸照时，她可不希望20年后丈夫要竞选总统，裸照却出现在小报头版，还配上‘色迷迷办公室’这样的标题。”

Many Twitter users seemed to agree.

很多推特网友也持同样看法。

"I am appalled and outraged by The New York Post's Melania Trump cover," tweeted one user, added "Misogyny is misogyny."

一位推特网友说：“《纽约邮报》在头版刊登梅拉尼娅的裸照，我很震惊也非常愤怒。这就是赤果果的厌女症。”

 "Just saw that New York Post cover. Ugh, trash," tweeted another.

另一位网友这样写道：看看《纽约邮报》的头版吧，啊呸，垃圾。”

A third , "Printing Melania Trump's naked pics is vile."

还有人说：“把梅拉尼娅的裸照印上去非常卑鄙下流。”

Many, though, were simply outraged, citing the republication of the photos as misogyny, a cheap blow that has nothing to do with politics.

【美报登特朗普妻子裸照惹众怒】相关文章：

★ 中国5月出口增速反弹

★ 细数接吻的六大功效：今天你亲吻了吗？

★ [希腊神话]阿克里西俄斯

★ 默克尔呼吁建立欧洲政治联盟

★ SABMiller在华业绩增长放缓

★ 双语：七旬 “女巫” 被活活烧死

★ 悲惨的2012年

★ 美国基建有多落后？

★ 电子产品出口推动台湾经济回暖

★ 欧盟报告称立陶宛为“谋杀之都”