实际上，西格尔的团队利用视觉可能欺骗我们的原理模拟出了人类情感的潜意识经验。

We all have one dominant eye and one more passive non-dominant one.

每个人都有一个主视眼和一个更加被动的非主视眼。

If each eye is receiving different information, we only consciously perceive what dominant one sees. But non-dominant sights can still seep into our subconcscious.

如果两个眼睛接收到的信息不同，那么我们下意识地只接受主视眼所看到的情景。但非主视眼所看到的信息仍然会留在我们的潜意识中。

Dr Siegel and her team use this to gently and prime their study participants to feel one way or another.

西格尔的团队利用这一点小心地引导，让研究参与者产生不同的感觉。

They showed 43 people two sets of flashing images simultaneously, so that the dominant eye saw and registered neutral expressions, while the non-dominant eye 'saw' flashes of neutral, grimacing or smiling faces, that they would only subconsciously be aware of.

他们向43人同时展示两组一闪而过的照片，以便让主视眼看到并记下中性表情，同时让非主视眼“看到”中性、苦笑或微笑的面孔，而参与者只能下意识地明白这一点。

After viewing the flashing faces, the researchers showed the participants options of faces and asked pick out which ones they had seen.

【研究：蒙娜丽莎是否“微笑”要看观众情绪】相关文章：

★ 案例研究：温州的地下融资链

★ “市场宠儿”越南风光不再

★ 北京拟加大奥运期间空气治理力度

★ 双语：英国“最大狗”新鲜出炉

★ 今年圣诞不寂寞 “扁平爸爸”相作伴

★ 玉米收成“灾难”将推高美国肉价

★ 阿里巴巴业绩大幅增长

★ 苹果和联想双双计划在美国生产PC

★ “福利国家”是如何养成的？

★ 稀土价格暴跌 企业开发热情骤减