The investigation team also looked into another economic dispute case, a trial which Wang claimed to have involved irregularities.
The probe found that despite some defects regarding the identification and calculation of the sum of profits involved in the case, the substance of the ruling by the SPC, as the case's appellate court, was right.
The team found that Yan Changlin, a former senior supervisory official with the SPC's supervision bureau, was suspected of accepting requests from one party involved in the case and attempting to meddle in the case, which was handled by Wang at the time.
Wang said he had refused to rule in favor of Yan's acquaintance, and the SPC supervision bureau had later taken actions against him "in revenge" for his refusal to cooperate.
The team noted that Yan was suspected of serious violations of Party disciplinary rules and laws and has been investigated by the anti-graft agency, but the "revenge" claim of Wang was not true.
During more than a month of investigation, investigators held more than 210 interviews with people involved, reviewed over 100 files and documents, carefully examined video and digital evidence and processed information from the public, the statement said.
The investigation team suggested that the SPC should correct the problems exposed, including delayed trials, loose internal management and poor management of confidential documents.
【国内英语资讯:Investigation on alleged misconduct by supreme court wrapped up】相关文章:
★ 美国外交的困局
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15