即使这座建筑最初的形态已经不存在了，甚至整个建筑完全不存在了，有关这些创新设计是否让建筑的重量减轻的争论也会继续下去。

'The Olympic Stadium here is an almost obvious, in-your-face example of a building that doesn't need to be there forever,' Mr. Sheard says. 'Some people say, 'This isn't even a real building. It's not an icon.' And other people are saying it's a new kind of icon, a 21st-century icon.'

谢尔德说，这里奥运体育馆明摆着就是不需要永久存在的建筑；有些人说，这甚至不是一座真正意义上的建筑，不是一个标志性建筑；还有一些人说，它是一种新的具有标志性的东西，21世纪的标志。

Icon or not, the stadium has an uncertain future. The process of choosing a post-Olympic tenant and a new configuration for the building has been bogged down by an extended and sometimes controversial bidding process.

无论是否具有标志意义，体育馆的未来都充满了不确定性。为了在奥运结束后为奥运体育馆找到使用者和外形结构，英国不得不进行旷日持久、有时甚至引发争议的招标。

Four bidders are currently vying to take control of the stadium, including two soccer teams, a soccer college and a company that would stage Formula One auto races in the stadium and on surrounding roadways. A winner will be picked in the fall.

【伦敦奥运主场馆:可轻松拆除的体育馆】相关文章：

★ 世界末日相安无事 少年跳河乐极生悲

★ 一周运动多长时间才健康?可能比你想的少!

★ 世界第一辆水陆两栖冰淇淋车

★ 李娜击败斯齐亚沃尼，赢法网冠军创造历史

★ 今年樱花何时开放？原来日本是这样预测樱花花期的

★ 语言学学士教你背单词

★ 告别的终将告别，但不会忘记

★ 女性过量饮用咖啡危害大 或导致不孕

★ 大学老师怎么看待慢学生？

★ 我国科学家发现了可抑制HIV扩散的蛋白质