但如果你不相信我的话,问问30人小组(G30)中其他银行的CEO们吧。G30是一个由金融家和监管者组成的论坛。G30在2017年的一份报告中指出,全球金融机构分离高级职位有着“不容置疑的逻辑”。G30的工作小组写道:“CEO承受的压力和职责发展到几乎超过一个人所能承受的范围。”
It also estimated chairmen-CEOs at financial groups spent 35 per cent of their time on board matters. An independent chairman lets the chief executive devote that time to managing the business. Separation cuts conflicts of interest and promotes constructive challenge in the boardroom. In short, a split not only limits problems caused when a student marks his own homework but gives him more time to do the homework in the first place.
该报告还估计,金融集团的CEO兼董事长拿出35%的时间解决董事会的问题。CEO若不兼任董事长,就可以把这些时间投入到管理企业当中。这样减少了利益冲突,推动了董事会的建设性质询。简言之,CEO和董事长由不同的人担任,不仅限制了学生给自己的家庭作业打分导致的问题,而且还让学生首先有更多时间做家庭作业。
Many US companies have begun to favour the governance model that most big UK companies use, even though it used to be as alien as cricket. Booz and Co calculated new appointments of chair-CEOs were down from 40 per cent in 2000 to 18 per cent in 2011. The proportion of truly independent chairmen at Fortune 500 companies has risen from 9 to 20 per cent in a decade.
【权势之争:董事长与CEO之间的种种】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15