不论诉讼结果如何,它都说明了很多问题:各家公司应该如何衡量实习生工作的价值?实习生是否有权利像正式员工一样获得工资?
It's perfectly reasonable for interns to be paid. Stipends for living expenses are only fair, especially for young people from low-income households, who may not otherwise be able to afford an unpaid internship. Paying interns also helps employers draw better talent, such as atGoogle (GOOG), which actively recruits interns and pays them handsomely for working on substantive projects.
实习生获得薪水是非常合理的事。向实习生提供薪水以支付生活开支是公平的做法,尤其是对于来自低收入家庭的年轻人而言,因为他们无力承担无薪实习生活。此外,向实习生支付薪水也可以帮助雇主吸引更优秀的人才。例如,谷歌(Google)积极招聘实习生,同时给实习生提供丰厚的薪水,安排他们参加实质性的项目。
Nevertheless, it would be wrong to elevate the fight over intern pay to the level of seriousness accorded to the ongoing debate over raising the federal minimum wage. For the most part, internships are training wheels, and the rules applied to them shouldn't be the same as a regular job. The decision to pay interns should really be at the discretion of employers -- not a matter of law.
然而,把是否应该向实习生支付薪水上升到国家最低工资辩论的高度却并不是正确的做法。实习在很大程度上是一种训练,适用于普通工作的规定却不一定适用于实习。是否要向实习生支付薪水,应该是雇主自行决定的事情,与法律无关。
【实习生该不该拿工资】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15