That’s far higher than in Italy (4.4:1) or Germany (2.5:1), not to mention England. In a market dominated by so few businesses, most teams can’t spend significant sums for players. During the summer player buying market, Barcelona, Real Madrid and Atlético de Madrid (a distant third in revenues) accounted for 81% of the EUR479 million Spanish teams spent.
这要比意大利(4.4:1)和德国(2.5:1)高得多,更不用说英格兰了。在一个由如此少的俱乐部统治的市场,大多数球队都拿不出很多钱来追逐球员。在夏天的球员交易市场,巴塞罗那、皇家马德里和马德里竞技(Atlético de Madrid,收入远远地排在第三)购买球员的花费,占据西甲球队购买球员耗费总额(4.79亿欧元)的81%。
There is reason to believe that the Premier League will hold on to its economic dominance its role as the biggest talent shopper. Because of a new EUR6.5 billion broadcast deal, Premier League teams took home EUR1.95 billion in TV fees in the season that ended in May, up 60% from EUR1.2 billion last year.
因此我们有理由相信,英超联赛会继续保持球星最大买家的经济统治地位。在新签署的65亿欧元转播合同下,英超联赛在今年5月结束的赛季中收入了19.5亿欧元的转播费,比上赛季的12亿欧元提高了60%。
With this boom in broadcast rights, Deloitte estimates that Premier League teams brought in about EUR4 billion in revenues in the 2016-2017 season, or more than the Spanish and Italian leagues combined.
【欧洲各大足球联赛贫富差距根源】相关文章:
★ 孕期减肥安全吗?
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15