就在上周,5月11日,新罕布什尔州就管制裸露上身的措施而开展了辩论,最新提案试图让各城市自己决定居民应该在公共场所穿什么样的衣服。虽然这项议案很难通过,但新罕布什尔州上演的戏剧性事件已再次引发全国针对上半身裸体的争论。
Ironically, both sides claim they’re protecting women from being sexualized. For proponents of keeping women covered up, the breast is first and foremost a sexual organ. Showing it off is simply too provocative, they argue, and young children should not be exposed to such naked sexuality.
讽刺的是,持不同意见的双方均声称他们是为了让女性免受性别歧视。支持者认为女人应穿着得体,因为胸部是最主要的性器官。暴露胸部简直太过挑逗,而且青少年和儿童不应该看到这么赤裸裸的性特征。
The counterarguments, naturally, say the exact opposite. Breasts are no more sexual than earlobes or lips: Just because they can be used during sex doesn’t mean they are sexual organs, per se. Free the Nipple advocates also argue that women can be as attracted to shirtless men as men can be to shirtless women. The only difference is, the law reflects a male perspective, not a female’s.
而显然,反对者们则持完全相反的意见。胸部并不比耳垂、嘴唇更具有性暗示:仅仅因为在性行为中胸部能起到作用,并不意味着它本质上就是性器官。“解放上半身”的拥护者还提出,女人能被赤膊的男人吸引,男人同样也可以被赤膊的女人吸引。两者之间唯一的区别就是,法律反映的是男性的需求,而非女性。
【女性有没有解放上半身的权利?】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15