尽管水滴直播平台回应说，直播得到了经营场所的允许，使用闭路电视摄像机并张贴标识告知顾客他们正在被直播，但其行为仍然侵犯了顾客隐私。

People have the right to privacy and their consent to be livestreamed is needed. A simple notice of livestreaming does not equate to permission being granted by customers.

人们拥有隐私权，需要得到允许才能进行直播。张贴简单的直播标识并不等同于得到了顾客的同意。

If permission cannot be obtained from all the customers, then there is a violation of the privacy rights of some.

如果无法得到所有顾客的同意，就侵犯了其中一部分人的隐私权。

Although there are laws and regulations in China to protect people's privacy, the cost to safeguard legal rights and interests is comparatively high, and it is difficult to calculate the loss caused by any violation according to the existing law.

尽管中国有保护隐私的法律法规，但保护法定权利和权益的成本相当高昂，也很难根据现行法律计算出由于侵犯隐私导致的损失。

As the cost of violating a person's privacy is very low, it is even a means for shops and restaurants to pursue profits, that's why privacy violations through illegal livestreaming have become more and more frequent.

由于侵犯个人隐私成本很低，这甚至成为商店和餐馆的赚钱之道。因此通过非法视频直播侵犯隐私的行为越来越常见。

【360水滴直播引风波：“周鸿祎，别再盯着我们看”】相关文章：

★ FT社评：意大利需要蒙蒂

★ 情人节约会指南——爱意表达小贴士

★ 360水滴直播引风波：“周鸿祎，别再盯着我们看”

★ 最新研究挑战传统：男生学理科未必有优势

★ 蒙古国政局不稳 拖累新发债券行情

★ 奥运选手“备战”污染

★ 澳门马拉松赛程失误考验选手耐力

★ 2012最值得期待的10件事

★ 财务与IT的契合度

★ 双语：牙膏会让胎儿大脑受损？