Australia's High Court has rejected two separate legal challenges to the government's voluntary postal vote that could give lawmakers the go-ahead to legalize same-sex marriage.

The court did not issue any written opinions Thursday explaining why it decided to reject the challenges after two days of hearings.

Gay rights advocates went to the Melbourne-based court seeking to scrap the plan, arguing that Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull's government does not have the authority to spend $97 million on a postal vote. They also expressed fears the vote could bring harm to Australia's gay, lesbian and transgender community, and have demanded lawmakers go on the record with a simple "yes" or "no" vote.

The High Court's decision means the government can go ahead and begin mailing the ballots next week, with the results to be announced in November. If a majority of "yes" ballots are returned, lawmakers would follow through with a vote on the measure the following month.

澳大利亚联邦最高法院驳回了两项对政府进行同性婚姻自愿邮寄公民投票的法律挑战。

澳大利亚最高法院星期四没有发表书面陈述，说明经过两天听证后为什么决定驳回挑战。

同性恋权益倡导者前往位于墨尔本的最高法院，希望取消邮寄投票的计划。他们表示，特恩布尔政府无权划拨9700万美元用于邮寄投票。他们还表示，担心投票会给澳大利亚的男女同性恋和跨性别者群体带来伤害，并要求议员直接记名投票，表示支持还是反对。

【澳大利亚最高法院驳回对同性婚姻投票的挑战】相关文章：

★ SEC主席夏皮罗将离任 留下权力真空

★ 英国高校校长反对移民限制

★ 奥巴马称赞缅甸政治改革

★ 东南亚高增长吸引投资者目光

★ 华为计划在诺基亚后院扩张业务

★ 意大利：近百岁夫妇因40年前婚外情闹离婚（双语）

★ 《大破天幕杀机》重回北美周末票房榜榜首

★ 现代人压力过大 睡梦中发短信电邮（双语）

★ 漫画图说：我的新年计划（双语）

★ 美国共和党松动对富人增税的立场