The alternative “demand support view also recognises the need to contain debt accumulation and avoid high inflation, but it pushes for steps to increase demand in the short run as a means of jump-starting economic growth and setting off a virtuous circle in which income growth, job creation and financial strengthening are mutually reinforcing.

另一种“需求支撑观点也认识到，控制债务增长和避免高通胀是必要的，但这个观点认为，应采取措施增加短期需求，从而快速启动经济增长，带动收入增长、就业岗位增加、财政改善三者互相促进的良性循环。

International economic dialogue has vacillated between these two viewpoints in recent years. At moments of particularly acute concern about growth, such as in spring 2010 and now, the IMF and many but not all monetary and fiscal authorities tend to emphasise demand-support views. But the moment clouds start to lift, orthodoxy reasserts itself and attention shifts to fiscal contraction and long-run financial hygiene.

在近年来的国际经济讨论中，这两种观点轮流占据上风。在增长问题格外尖锐的时候，比如2010年春和现在，IMF和其他许多（但不是全部）货币与财政权威机构倾向于“需求支撑观点。而一旦乌云开始消散，正统观点就会重新得势，人们又把注意力转移到财政收缩和金融体系的长期健康上面。

【世界经济仍在恶性循环】相关文章：

★ 日本经济面临两难抉择

★ 卜拉希米特使呼吁成立叙利亚过渡政府

★ 美国经济亟需解决的问题

★ 中国二季度经济增速跌至三年来最低点

★ 大象选美：大块头也有美丽容颜

★ IMF放弃反对资本管制立场

★ 阿联酋重金奖励夺奥运奖牌运动员

★ 英经济政策重演哈布斯堡的衰落

★ FT社评：罗姆尼-瑞安团队选情不乐观

★ 第三季公司收入预示美国经济不容乐观