Bear in mind that the editorial process should take at least as long as the writing process. The first couple rounds may be slow going but quite quickly, the learning will gear up to progress faster than you ever thought possible.
Use the combined feedback to plan future lessons. If you see certain errors cropping up repeatedly (for either the writer or editors) assign supplemental worksheets for the individual teams.
Aside from the reduced workload on the teacher and the increased speed of writing improvement, peer-editing has several other advantages:
Strong editors will become highly sought after by their peers.
Thoroughness and attention to detail will become traits of positive competition in the classroom.
Students will have their work completed more often. While they may have excuses ready for a teacher, students are less likely to give (or accept) them with their peers.
Peer editing is a skill highly desired by employers and one that is used in higher education.
The process increases autonomy and self-directed improvement as a life-long skill.
Once the process gets going, teachers will find their grading time dramatically cut and they will be able to spend that time giving more sustentative feedback with less focus on mechanical errors and sloppy proofreading.
Decades of educational research support the use of peer editing. Studies have shown that peer editing not only increases overall fluency more than control groups which did not use the technique but it’s been linked to improved reading comprehension as well.
【引导学生参与作文评阅 提升写作水平】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-08-28
2020-08-21
2020-08-19
2020-08-14
2020-08-12