Axact对《纽约时报》报道的回应_时事

Axact对《纽约时报》报道的回应

此外，这名记者没有提及与《纽约时报》存在的利益关系，《纽约时报》将其与快报传媒集团的合作视为在巴基斯坦的收入来源。鉴于《纽约时报》的巴基斯坦合作伙伴涉嫌刑事案件，这种利益关系的披露是必要的，但在文中被有意隐去，如此不义之举，不应该是NYT这样的媒体所为。

In an exemplary display of poor journalistic skills and yellow journalism, the writer quotedreferences from several imaginary employees to corroborate accusations made out of thin air.None of these accusations have been substantiated with any real proof. Search engines havebeen used to type ‘fake degrees’ and whatever images have turned up have been portrayed asevidence. Additionally, no proof has been given linking any of these sites and allegations toAxact and widely recognized names such as that of John Kerry have been used to increase theimpact of the story. In fact the writer himself admits that when he approached theseuniversities, they denied having any links with Axact. Furthermore, in a glaring display of bias,he didn’t even mention the fact that all these previous published allegations have been morethan adequately addressed by Axact earlier in the civil suit 907/2013 filed against GEO andothers.

作者在文中引用了若干虚构员工的话，以证实一些无中生有的指控，堪称蹩脚的报道技巧和黄色资讯写作的典型。所有的指控都没有任何真正的证据支持。作者在搜索引擎中键入“假学位，显示的所有图片都被其称为证明。此外，没有证据表明这些网站和事实陈述与Axact有关。一些大人物的名字也被用来提高故事的冲击力，例如约翰·克里(John Kerry)。事实上，作者承认，当他联系这些大学时，它们都否认同Axact有关系。此外还有一个非常醒目的证据证明作者具有偏向性：作者甚至没有提到，在此前对GEO及其它公司发起的民事诉讼907/2013中，Axact已经对报道中提及的指控做出了极其充分的阐述。

【Axact对《纽约时报》报道的回应】相关文章：

★ 怎样挖出违规员工

★ NBA开启“林书豪时代” 关于Jeremy Lin的5件事（双语）