他们对人们在屏幕(iPad上的Kindle应用软件)和纸质阅读是否存在差异进行研究,不过也观察了阅读小说和非小说之间的差异。他们给了研究对象一篇讲述一宗发生在商场的真实谋杀案的文章,告诉其中一组这件事是虚构的,告诉另一组文章是真实的。
Among those who thought it was fiction, there was little difference between screen and printreaders. Those reading from the iPad were a little unsure of their location in the text. But theirgrasp of the narrative, their immersion in the story and how much sympathy they felt withthe characters differed little from that of the print readers.
在认为阅读内容为小说的研究对象中,屏幕阅读和纸质阅读之间几乎没有差别。在iPad上阅读的人对文中所述事件的发生地点有点不确定。但是他们对文字叙述的理解、对故事情节的投入以及对人物的同情程度,与纸质阅读者几乎没有差别。
Among those who thought they were reading non-fiction, there was a significant difference.The iPad readers had less narrative grasp, less immersion and less sympathy.
那组认为自己阅读的是非小说的研究对象,则存在显著差别。与纸质阅读者相比,iPad阅读者对文字叙述的理解更差,对故事的投入更弱,同情心也更少。
Why the difference? The writers quote research suggesting that reading non-fiction involvesfast processing (“skimming) while fiction involves slow processing (“savouring).
【屏幕阅读pk纸质阅读】相关文章:
★ 外套流行超大号
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15