and its price rises have been lower than those imposed by other publishers over the past fewyears.
而且过去几年来,其价格涨幅要比其它出版商要低。
Elsevier s enviable margins, Dr Fowler says, are simply a consequence of the firm sefficient operation.
Fowler博士称,Elsevier那让人眼红的盈利幅度,只是该公司高效运转的结果。
Dr Neylon s petition, though, is symptomatic of a wider conflict between academics andtheir publishersa conflict that is being thrown into sharp relief by the rise of onlinepublishing.
然而,Neylon博士的请愿不过是学术及其出版商之间矛盾扩大化的一种象征由于网络出版业的崛起,这种矛盾已经得到大大的缓解了。
Academics, who live in a culture which values the free and easy movement of informationhave long been uncomfortable bedfellows with commercial publishing companies,
学术,能生长于一个重视信息传播的自由性与方便性的文化环境中,同时也是一个愿意无偿编辑和评判文章的事物。
which want to maximise profits by charging for access to that information, and who controlmany of the most prestigious scientific journals.
但长期以来,学术与商业化出版商就格格不入,后者希望通过向信息获取者收费从而使利润最大化,此外还掌控着大多数最负盛名的科学刊物。
【2015考研英语阅读科学出版信息的价格】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30