而在大型强子对撞机上的这两个独立实验就已经检测到这样的反常频密现象。
Individually, each team s result could be a statistical fluke.
客观地说,每个研究团队所得出的结论可能只是统计意义上的偶然现象。
Neither reaches the exacting standard of proof that particle physicists require to accept aresult unequivocallynamely one chance in 3.5m that it occurred by accident.
两者都达到粒子物理学家所提出能确定无疑地接受为证据的严苛标准即三百五十万次实验中偶尔发生一次。
Instead, they each achieved a significance of somewhere between one chance in 1,000 andone in six, depending on which statistical test you use.
不止如此,它们各自都获得了显著的观测数据,从一千次发生一次到六次发生一次的范围之内,这取决于你所采用的统计学测试标准。
What set the scientists gathered in Grenoble aflutter, though, was that both experimentsascribed the excesses they observed to the same putative decay patternone involving Wbosons, which mediate the weak nuclear force that is responsible for certain types ofradioactive decay.
令到聚集在格勒诺布尔的科学家们兴奋不已的是,这两个实验中所观察到的反常频密现象都要归因于相同的公认衰变模式一种涉及W玻色子的衰变,该玻色力是传递弱核力的媒介,而弱核力是某些特定种类放射性衰变的主因。
【2015考研英语阅读捕获希格斯粒子】相关文章:
最新
2016-10-18
2016-10-11
2016-10-11
2016-10-08
2016-09-30
2016-09-30