They, though dubbing themselves as “lecturers in human rights,” in fact resort to it as a tool to play politics, adopt double standards and interfere in the domestic affairs of other countries by using human rights as an excuse.
西方国家的人权话语垄断是完全经不起推敲的。著名学者佩里·安德森不久前指出:“(当前国际)人权话语宛如19世纪‘文明标准’的当代翻版。”19世纪末,欧洲国际法学家明确以欧洲“文明”来衡量世界各国,将各国划分为“文明”“野蛮”和“蒙昧”等类别。尽管历史已经证明这种文明观的荒谬与非正义,但时至今天,西方一些人还是没有弄明白,他们的人权“等级观”和“优越感”,本身就是落后和蒙昧。
The West has no grounds to monopolize the rights of speech in terms of human rights. Scholar Perry Anderson said in a recent commentary that the human rights discourse in today’s world is a contemporary version of the “civilization standards” of the 19th century.
Back at the end of the 19th century, European jurists pigeonholed countries as “civilized,” “barbaric” and “savage” by comparing them with a “European standard,” but history has proven that such logic is absurd and unjust.
However, some Westerners, up to now, failed to realize that their so-called “superiority” and “classification” are the best evidence of their barbarism.
【国际人权事业需平等交流】相关文章:
★ 少儿英语绕口令 A tutor who tooted a flute
最新
2020-09-15
2020-08-28
2020-08-21
2020-08-19
2020-08-14
2020-08-12