Did you agree with the other two statements? If so, you fell into our trap. All three statements are false─or at least not substantiated by scientific evidence. Unfortunately, if you got any of them wrong, you're hardly alone.
另两个表述你赞同吗?如果赞同,那你就落入我们的圈套了。三个表述全都是错的──至少没有科学证据支持。不幸的是,不管你赞同哪个错误的表述,与你犯同样错误的都是大有人在。
These 'neuromyths,' along with others, were presented to 242 primary and secondary school teachers in the Netherlands and the U.K. as part of a study by Sanne Dekker and colleagues at VU University Amsterdam and Bristol University, and just published in the journal Frontiers in Psychology. They found that 47% of the teachers believed the 10% myth. Even more, 76%, believed that enriching children's environments will strengthen their brains.
桑内·德克尔(Sanne Dekker)和他在阿姆斯特丹自由大学(VU University Amsterdam)及英国布里斯托大学(Bristol University)的同事开展了一项研究,研究结果刚刚发表在《心理学前沿》(Frontiers in Psychology)杂志上。作为研究工作的一部分,他们将这三道“神经科学谜题与其它问题一道拿给荷兰和英国的242名中小学教师进行测试。他们发现,47%的老师相信那个10%误区,甚至更多的老师(76%)相信丰富孩子们身处的环境可以强化他们的大脑。
【我们只使用了大脑的10%?】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15