控方指出，专家们在2009年3月31日举行紧急会议后，仅对“地震活动的风险提出了大概的、一般的、无效的估算，而且传达了不完整、不准确、不一致的信息。”

The experts, part of Italy’s Great Risks commission, issued a memo that day in which they concluded that it was “improbable” that there would be a big earthquake。

被诉专家在会议当天发布了一份备忘录，结论是“不太可能”发生强震。他们同属于意大利高风险委员会。

That meant, prosecutors say, that as more tremors hit L’Aquila in the days leading up to the quake, tens of thousands of people had been lulled into a false sense of security and did not evacuate their homes。

控方称，拉奎拉地区在强震前小震日益频繁，但数万人误以为这里很安全，没有疏散。

The earthquake reduced much of L’Aquila’s medieval centre to rubble and flattened surrounding villages, leaving the region, north-east of Rome, looking like a war zone。

地震将拉奎拉的中世纪中心震成一片碎石，还夷平了周边村落，使罗马东北的拉奎拉地区看起来更像战区。

After a three-hour hearing, the trial was adjourned to Oct 1.

庭审持续三小时，并延期至10月1日再审。

【意地震专家因未能准确预报地震受审】相关文章：

★ 惊呆了的新研究：有些超级吃货能帮助医生治病

★ 辨别假笑其实并不难

★ BEC商务英语初级写作必备黄金句(1)

★ 避孕药或有助于降低患卵巢癌的风险

★ 新加坡,香港和巴黎登顶生活最昂贵城市榜单

★ 3D打印机有望“打印”出人体器官

★ 职场白领下班后做家务有害健康

★ “准时”这件事，在不同国家的含义差别竟然这么大！

★ 保持健康要日行一万步？4400步就够了

★ 今年樱花何时开放？原来日本是这样预测樱花花期的