该法院指出,一家“合理胜任的评级机构不至于对这种“复杂透顶的证券产品给出AAA评级。法官杰恩·简葛特(Jayne Jagot)表示,标普和荷兰银行批发银行部门(目前隶属苏格兰皇家银行(RBS))还发布一些“虚假或者涉及“疏忽的失实陈述的信息和声明。
The 1,500-page ruling marks the first time a rating agency has faced a full trial over a structured finance product.
这份长达1500页的判决书标志着信用评级机构第一次由于一种结构性金融产品而面对全面庭审。
The Australian ruling led some investors to reassess their previously sanguine view of the legal landscape for the rating agencies. In early trading in New York, S&P’s parent McGraw-Hill fell more than 5 per cent, versus a broadly flat equity market. Moody’s fell more than 2.5 per cent.
澳大利亚的裁定使得一些投资者重新评估他们此前对评级机构在法律事务上的乐观看法。在纽约早盘交易中,标普母公司麦格劳希尔(McGraw-Hill)的股价下跌了5%以上,而整体上股市没有太大起伏。穆迪(Moody’s)股价跌幅也超过2.5%。
“This is a major blow to the rating agencies, which for years have had the benefit of profiting from the assignment of these ratings without ever being accountable to investors for those opinions, said Amanda Banton, the lawyer representing the councils. “No longer will rating agencies be able to hide behind disclaimers to absolve themselves from liability.
【澳洲法院判决标普误导投资者】相关文章:
★ 世界各地喜迎新年
★ 伊索寓言7
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15