另一种衡量安全性的方法是所谓的“背后偷窥”测试。方法是让六名学生志愿者独自观看一位学生演示三种典型手势的视频,然后凭记忆重复这些手势。
The preliminary results were promising. “None of the attackers came even close to the gesture,” Lindqvist said.
初步测试的效果令人振奋。林奎斯特称:“偷窥者们甚至都无法画出相近的手势。”
In fact, one attacker did nearly replicate one of the gestures—a backwards “N”—but did not come close enough for a “recognizer” to authenticate.
事实上,还是有一人几乎画出了其中一种手势——一个倒写的字母“N”,但相似度没有达到系统“识别”通过的程度。
“Typing in a password seems to be an artifact of the past,” said Nasir Memon, professor of computer science and engineering at New York University, who was not involved in the study. “There is definitely a need to explore the alternatives.”
纽约大学(New York University)计算机科学与工程专业教授纳西尔o梅蒙说:“输入密码已经过时了,我们亟需发掘替代方案。”梅蒙并没有参与上面提到的研究。
Still, even with the aid of muscle memory, one must question how confusing a world of security gestures might become.
不过,即便有肌肉记忆辅助,我们也可能会被一大堆手势密码弄得不知所措。
【还在用密码和手势锁屏? 试试更安全的涂鸦吧】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15