So why did Apple, whose large iPad and new Macs boast extremely high screen resolution, choose a lower resolution for the Mini? The company did so because it says there are only two resolutions that allow its tablet apps to run unmodified. One is the extremely high resolution on the current large iPad, which would have boosted the cost and lowered the battery life of the Mini. The other, the one Apple chose for the Mini, is the same resolution on iPad models consumers have snapped up: the original iPad and the iPad 2, which is still on the market at $399.
那么,苹果为什么要选择为Mini配置分辨率较低的显示屏呢?(该公司的新款iPad和新版Mac都以极高的屏幕分辨率为卖点。)苹果公司称,这样做的原因是,只有两种解决方案能使其平板电脑应用程序照原样运行。一种是采用目前新款iPad的极高分辨率,这样会推高成本并减弱Mini的电池续航能力。另一种(也就是苹果为Mini选择的方案)是采用与第一代iPad和iPad 2这两种热门款型相同的分辨率。iPad 2市场仍然有售,售价为399美元。
This makes sense, but it means that, unlike its closest competitors, the Mini can't play video in high definition. Apple insists the device does better than standard definition, if you are obtaining the video from its iTunes service, since iTunes scales the video for the device, so it will render somewhere between standard definition and HD. It says some other services will do the same. But the lack of true HD gives the Nexus and Fire HD an advantage for video fans. In my tests, video looked just fine, but not as good as on the regular iPad.
【莫博士测评iPad Mini】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15