萨塞克斯大学(University of Sussex)人工智能专家布莱•惠特比(Blay Whitby)表示:“就现有的技术而言,我们不能‘将责任记在’机器人头上。机器人还没到发展到那种程度,我们不应认为它们能为其所做的决策承担责任。
“This unfortunate accident is technically and morally comparable to a machine operator beingcrushed because he didn’t use the safety guard, he added. “In this case it’s more complexand therefore more forgivable because ‘the safety guard’ [at Volkswagen] was provided bycomputer software and he was in the process of setting it up.
他补充说:“从技术和道德角度说,这起不幸的事故相当于一名机械操作员因未采取安全防护而被挤死了。具体到这个例子,情况要更复杂一些,因此也更值得原谅,因为(大众的)‘安全防护’是由电脑软件提供的,而他当时正在配置这一软件。
The next robotic generation — known variously as “workplace assistant robots, “collaborativerobots or just “cobots — are designed to operate uncaged alongside people. Theyincorporate sensors and other safety features to limit the force they can exert and preventthem running amok.
下一代机器人被称为“工作场所助理机器人、“协作机器人或简称“Cobot(collaborative robot的缩写——译者注)。从设计上说,这种机器人是不在笼子里而是在人们身边工作的。这种机器人拥有传感器及其他安防措施,能够限制它们的力气并防止它们横冲直撞。
【大众工厂机器人杀人是工业事故】相关文章:
★ 狐狸和乌鸦
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15