社交媒体时代,记录“邓巴数字”的学术研究并不多。但是有两个Twitter上的研究显示,150这个数字可能仍然是一个可信的标准。有一个挺搞笑的测试是《连线》杂志作者Rick Lax做的,他联系了自己的1000个Facebook好友,看看有多少人能够和他进行有意义的交流。
As Lax ruefully recounted, many of his supposed friends either said they had no idea who he was, or had undergone major changes in their lives that he was left with the realization that he didn't really know them well at all. "In trying to disprove Dunbar’s number," Lax wrote, "I actually proved it."
Lax后来苦笑着说,很多他所谓的好友要么说根本不知道他是谁,要不就是这些好友变化太大,以至于Lax自己都不知道他们是谁了。Lax写道:“本来我是想证伪邓巴数字的理论,哪知道最后证明了它。”
打开微信联系人列表,拉到底,估计你的数字也超过了邓巴教授的研究结论。
那么,拥有动辄数千个联系人的感受是什么样的呢?
I had 2000+ "friends" on Facebook when I was a student because I was a part of a lot of student organizations (one in my field of study, one in my university, a position in a national student organization as well). Those "friends" built up over time, with student I've met all around my country.
我还是学生的时候有2000+ Facebook好友,因为我参加了很多学生组织(有一个我本专业的,一个校内的,还有一个国家级学生组织)。全国各地这样的学生接触多了,这种“朋友”就慢慢多起来了。
【微信好友2k+的人是怎么管理自己社交圈的?】相关文章:
★ 日本外相喊话外媒:安倍晋三的正确写法应该是Abe Shinzo
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15