面对这个分数,我的第一反应是不相信。我抓起话机拨打了Klout首席执行官乔·费尔南德斯(Joe Fernandez)的电话,铃声刚响他就接了。我有些底气不足地抗议道,我在Twitter上有2万关注者,Klout一定是算错了。但费尔南德斯不以为意。
The number of followers means nothing, he said, as people can buy them. Although I didn’t like the insinuation, I fear Klout may have rumbled me. In truth, all my tweets are put out by the FT’s PR team, as I can’t be bothered to do it myself. I never retweet; don’t follow anyone; there is absolutely no connecting going on at all. So I guess 10 is what I deserve.
费尔南德斯说,关注者多少毫无意义,因为可以花钱买到。尽管这种暗示令我不快,但我担心Klout可能已经看穿了我。事实上,我在Twitter上的所有消息都由英国《金融时报》的公关团队代发,我可没那个工夫自己发。我从来不转发别人的消息,不关注任何人,没有在Twitter上与其他人进行任何互动。所以,我觉得自己得10分也是应该的。
In any case, a part of me is proud of the low score. There is something distinguished about being such a spectacular dud on social networks. It is evidence of having a proper life in which clout is not only measured correctly, it is spelt correctly too.
不论如何,低分倒是让我略感自豪。成为这样一个与众不同的社交网络“废物,也是一番成就。这证明我的生活是正常的,我不仅能够正确地衡量影响力这件事,还能正确地拼写这个单词(影响力的正确拼写为clout,而非klout——译者注)。
【没有Klout,生活更美好】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15