在一次接受好莱坞记者采访时,艾什顿·库彻表示,“沃兹受雇于另一家公司支持不同版本的史蒂夫·乔布斯电影”,并援引了艾伦·索金的定于今年晚些时候上映的电影。“这对他来说是个人的,但同时它也是生意。我们必须要记住这一点。”
Wozniack soon responded to Kutcher's jab in a post he wrote on Gizmodo:
沃兹尼亚克很快在Gizmodo(美国知名科技博客)回应了艾什顿·库彻的抨击:
I suspect a lot of what was wrong with the film came from Ashton's own image of Jobs. Ashton made some disingenuous and wrong statements about me recently (including my supposedly having said that the 'movie' was bad, which was probably Ashton believing pop press headlines) and that I didn't like the movie because I'm paid to consult on another one. These are examples of Ashton still being in character. Either film would have paid me to consult, but the Jobs one already had a script written. I can't take that creative leadership from someone else. And I was turned off by the Jobs script. But I still hoped for a great movie.
对艾什顿·库彻扮演乔布斯的自我形象而给影片带来的出入,我表示存在很多疑问。最近艾什顿做出了一些关于我的虚假错误的言论(包括我可能会说“这部电影”不好,它可能是艾什顿认为的流行资讯头条),还有就是说我不喜欢这部电影,因为我受雇于另一家公司为他们提供信息参考。这些是关于艾什顿一些有据可查的例子。要么电影公司雇佣我提供信息参考,但乔布斯一角已经有书面的剧本。我无法从别人那里夺走这种具有创造性的领导力。我已经被拒参演。但我仍然希望有一部很棒的电影。
【苹果创始人沃兹批《乔布斯传》不实】相关文章:
★ “晚婚不婚”上热搜,结婚率连跌5年,这届年轻人为啥不爱结婚了?
★ 你捡到钱包会还给失主吗?调查显示,钱包里钱越多归还率越高
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15