按照数据,至少有一名女性创始人的投资团队的绩效高于创始人全是男性的团队60%以上,且年轻团队表现优于年长团队。在投资者看来,从经验汲取的智慧并不能带来回报,因为数据显示连环创业者的表现并未优于初次创业者(主要原因在于连环创业者的初始估值更高)。然而,令集体智慧的信奉者欣慰的是,团队创业者的绩效大大超过单人创业者。
Moreover, companies started outside the main technology hubs of the San Francisco Bay Area and New York performed just as well (or slightly better) from an investor point of view than those within. This is almost certainly because initial valuations in regional businesses were up to 50 per cent lower.
此外,从投资者的视角看,创建于旧金山湾区和纽约以外的公司表现与在这两个主要技术中心创立的公司相仿(甚至还稍好一点)。这几乎肯定是因为其它地方的初创企业初始估值低了50%。
One message from the First Round data appears to be that if you are a founder seeking a high valuation you should be in a known hub and a repeat founder. If you are an investor you should seek out companies with first-time founders and in regions not yet dubbed “silicon” this or that.
从First Round的数据似乎可以得出这样的见解:如果你是个寻求高估值的创业者,那你需要在著名的创业中心创建企业,而且最好是个连环创业者。如果你是投资者,你应该寻觅初次创业者,而且是在尚未被冠以“某某硅谷”美名的地方。
【风险投资家愿意把钱投给谁】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15