正如OECD所言:城市本身并不是导致温室气体排放的来源,罪魁祸首在于人们在城市里的交通方式,城市的无序扩张,以及人们在家中使用的和用于楼内取暖的能源。
In each of those areas there is scope for the innovation and design that would greatly reduce both energy consumption and carbon production.
在上述这些方面,创新和设计都能显著降低能源消耗和碳排放。
Planning is crucial.
规划是重中之重。
Halting urban and suburban sprawl should be at the heart of mitigation strategies.
控制城区和郊区的不断扩张应成为减弱气候变化影响战略的核心。
The gulf between the emissions generated by different cities is, in significant part, a reflection of differing levels of urban density.
不同城市碳排放量的巨大鸿沟在很大程度上反映了城市密度的差异。
The city of Los Angeles generates a lot more CO2 than New York City, even though the latter has a much bigger population.
洛杉矶市产生的二氧化碳比纽约市要多得多,尽管纽约市拥有更加庞大的人口规模。
The need is to make new developments more compact and to concentrate building on brownfield sites in inner cities.
因此有必要使新的开发项目集约化,并集中建设内城的棕色地带(brownfield site,受到污染,被废弃或闲置的前工业和商业用地)。
【应对气候变化 打造宜居城市】相关文章:
★ Netflix热映陈晓卿最新美食纪录片,千万别饿着肚子看
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15