他说:“我觉得她们有可能会产生冲突。我猜冲突源于这两位坚强独立的女性对待事物的不同观点,也就是她们二人做事方式之争。”
Burrell, who worked for Diana for 10 years before her tragic death in 1997, doesn't think Meghan is a carbon copy of Diana, of course. He said he thinks Meghan was probably more media savvy going into her royal marriage than Diana was. Diana, he said, had to learn to find her voice in the media.
在1997年戴安娜王妃惨死之前,Burrell曾为她工作10年。当然,他不认为梅根是戴安娜的复制品。他说他认为在梅根的皇室婚姻中,她可能比戴安娜更了解媒体。他说戴安娜还得学习如何应对媒体。
"I think the main difference between them is that Meghan has a game plan, whereas Diana was young and naïve," he added. "Diana did the book with Andrew Morton and courted the press over the years because she didn't have a voice. And her strong-mindedness meant she cared and she felt the people of the country had a right to know what had gone on behind closed doors."
他补充道:“我认为她们之间主要的区别是梅根有自己的规矩,但戴安娜太年轻、太天真。戴安娜和安德鲁·莫顿一起出书,在那些年里一直向媒体示好,因为她没有发言权。她坚强的意志意味着她在乎,她感觉英国人民有权知道一些不为人知的事。”
【梅根像戴安娜王妃?戴妃的管家认为这是哈里王子娶她的原因】相关文章:
★ 请别邀请我吃晚餐
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15