It continues: "Moreover, for many students, returning to their home countries to participate in online instruction is impossible, impracticable, prohibitively expensive, and/or dangerous."
诉讼中继续写道:“此外,对许多学生来说,回到自己的国家参加在线教学是不可能的,不可行的,成本高得令人望而却步,或者很危险。”
Harvard and MIT's lawsuit also received support from Cornell. The university said its international students will largely not be affected due to hybrid teaching, but expressed strong opposition.
哈佛大学和麻省理工学院的诉讼也得到了康奈尔大学的支持。康奈尔大学表示,由于实施混合教学模式,该校的国际学生在很大程度上不会受到这一政策的影响,但仍对此表示强烈反对。
"This was wholly unexpected, and it is a senseless and unfair policy that runs counter to all that we stand for as a global academic community," said Martha E. Pollack, president of Cornell University. There are more than 1 million international students in the US.
康奈尔大学校长玛莎·E.波拉克说:“这完全出乎意料,这是一项毫无意义、不公平的政策,与我们作为国际化的学术界所主张的一切背道而驰。”美国国际学生人数超过100万。
【哈佛大学和麻省理工学院起诉美国政府 反对留学生签证新规】相关文章:
★ 世界各地喜迎新年
★ 外套流行超大号
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15