Some studies have found little difference in comprehension and recall between those readingprint and those looking at screens. Others have found lower understanding and memory amongscreen readers.
一些研究发现,纸质阅读和屏幕阅读在理解和回忆方面几乎没有区别。另外一些研究发现,屏幕阅读者在理解和记忆方面表现较差。
Apart from the difficulties of assessing how people absorb meaning, digital devices are stillchanging and developing, attempting to make the reading process smoother.
除了在评估人们如何吸收语意上存在困难外,数字化设备仍在不断变化和发展,试图让阅读过程更加顺畅。
As reading researchers Anne Mangen of the University of Stavanger and Don Kuiken of theUniversity of Alberta admit, it is best to see their and others’ studies as “an exploration ofpossibilities rather than explicit hypothesis testing.
正如阅读研究员、挪威斯塔万格大学(University of Stavanger)的安妮•芒让(Anne Mangen)和加拿大阿尔伯塔大学(University of Alberta)的唐•奎肯(Don Kuiken)所承认的那样,最好把他们和其他人的研究看作是“一次关于可能性的探索,而非明确的假设检验。
Their research examined whether people read differently on a screen (the Kindle app on aniPad) and a printed page, but also looked at the difference between fiction and non-fiction.They gave their subjects a piece of writing describing an actual murder at a mall, and told onegroup it was made-up and the other that it was real.
【屏幕阅读pk纸质阅读】相关文章:
★ 双语阅读:法厄同
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15