这是我们用来研究这一现象所做出的早期图象之一。同样是一个社会网络,不过这一次我们把快乐的人涂成了黄色,难过的人涂成了蓝色,介于两者之间的人涂成了绿色。如果你看看这幅图片,你立马就能看到快乐的人和不快乐的人扎堆出现,同样地是传递到三层分离关系。你的直觉也许会告诉你不快乐的人在这个网络中占据着一个不同的结构点。这个网络有个中心部分、有个边缘地带,而不快乐的人好像都集中在边缘地带。再打个比方,如果你把这些社区网络想象成是一大块人类的绸缎──我与你相连,你和她相连,无止境地延伸──这块绸缎就好像是美国老式的被子一样,上面是一块块的补丁,有快乐的补丁,也有不快乐的。而你快乐与否就决定于你是否身处一块快乐补丁上。
So, this work with emotions, which are so fundamental, then got us to thinking about: Maybe the fundamental causes of human social networks are somehow encoded in our genes. Because human social networks, whenever they are mapped, always kind of look like this: the picture of the network. But they never look like this. Why do they not look like this? Why don't we form human social networks that look like a regular lattice? Well, the striking patterns of human social networks, their ubiquity and their apparent purpose beg questions about whether we evolved to have human social networks in the first place, and whether we evolved to form networks with a particular structure.
【如何与人打交道:人际关系的潜在影响】相关文章:
★ 抓住你的梦想
★ 不要再说对不起
★ 读大学的意义
★ 人才的全面发展
★ 对乞丐的看法
最新
2019-11-14
2019-11-09
2019-11-09
2019-11-08
2019-11-08
2019-11-07