"While we appreciate the trade mitigation program, it doesn't make farmers whole. The United States exports 50 percent of its wheat, which means we need a long-term solution," he said.

The trade aid package also drew criticism from U.S. lawmakers, as the lack of a long-term strategy and stability adds further uncertainty for farmers.

"I have a number of concerns about whether this plan is fair and equitable to all farmers. Government checks are no replacement for lost markets, and this temporary support will only go so far," said Debbie Stabenow, ranking member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, in a statement.

"Too many farmers are struggling as this administration continues to pursue a chaotic trade agenda. Our farmers need a focused strategy, access to export markets and long-term stability," Stabenow said.

Michael Bennet, a Democratic senator from the U.S. state of Colorado, said the trade aid package is further evidence that the administration's "disastrous policies are inflicting lasting damage on American agriculture."

"No one wins in a trade war," Bennet said. "Our farmers and ranchers deserve a trade agenda that provides the security and stability they need to plan for the long term and provide for their families."

Critics also argued that it is inequitable to use taxpayers' money to help just one industry harmed by U.S. trade policies, especially as agriculture is already one of the most subsidized and protected industries in the United States.

【国际英语资讯:Spotlight: U.S. farm groups want open markets, not govt aid】相关文章：

★ 朝鲜火箭发射计划惹恼韩国

★ 美国全民疯抢新款耐克乔丹球鞋 枪支、喷雾齐上场

★ 北极航线为液化气油轮赴亚洲开辟捷径

★ 中国电商价格战搅动零售市场

★ FT社评：意大利需要蒙蒂

★ 肯德基声明：没有“帅哥送餐”业务（双语）

★ 意大利中间派支持蒙蒂参选

★ 最新研究：红衣男人对女人更具吸引力？

★ 人民币国际化的深层原因

★ 阿米蒂奇:美国对中日岛争非持中立态度