After coming together in striking suspected chemical weapons sites in Syria, the U.S. and its European allies, France and Britain, may be far less unified in finding longer-term solutions for the conflict-torn country.

The first differences were on display hours after the strikes, as the White House appeared to rebut suggestions by French President Emmanuel Macron that he convinced his U.S. counterpart to remain in Syria and agree to limited military action.

Then came Macron's own re-messaging. The two countries were in line, he told reporters Monday, on how they viewed both their military and peace-building engagements.

Still, the Syria strategy, as outlined by Macron in recent days, seems far from being in lockstep with Washington. In particular, it demands engaging key Trump administration nemesis Iran, among other regional actors, to help resolve the tangled conflict.

And while the French president aims to position himself as Washington's go-to leader in Europe, in matters ranging from climate change to trade, experts question whether he can deliver tangible results.

Those questions will be front and center next week, when Macron and U.S. President Donald Trump hold talks in Washington.

美国与欧洲盟友法国和英国联合对叙利亚怀疑为化学武器设施的目标进行了导弹攻击之后，美英法三国在叙利亚这个饱受战争创伤的国家如何找到长期解决方案的问题上可能步调没有那么一致。

【联合打击后美法在叙利亚长期战略上显分歧】相关文章：

★ 伊索寓言之受伤的狼和精明的羊

★ 情人节约会指南——爱意表达小贴士

★ 澳大利亚需要新增长点

★ 嘉能可-斯特拉塔并购可能遭股东否决

★ 高管上任靠自己摸索？

★ 资讯英语：姚明成上海最年轻最高政协常委

★ SEC行政诉讼案威胁中概股在美前景

★ 苹果专利战的下一个敌人：谷歌

★ 西方干预能挽救叙利亚吗？

★ 英国弱视妇女捕获近百公斤重鲶鱼