但无论这个关于大猩猩和犀牛的故事真相如何,其关键教益也许是,故事在打破“藩篱方面给我们上了一课。今年7月,我写了一篇专栏文章,阐述了个人或机构成功跨越思想和知识上的“藩篱能够为自身带来的一些巨大益处。自那之后,我收到许多读者写来的电子邮件,提供了许多令人鼓舞的打破藩篱的现实事例。
But what I did not stress enough in my column is that attempts to silo-bust may not just be innovative. They can also have a nasty habit of upending the power structure, or of challenging conventional hierarchies. And so – sadly – for almost every story I was sent about the benefits of silo-busting, I received numerous examples of frustration. There are individuals in the US, for example, who have tried to change the operations of municipal government – but have met with fierce union opposition. There is a well-meaning academic at a west coast university who has tried to promote interdisciplinary research – only to learn that this could threaten his tenure track. And a senior individual in one large pharmaceutical company described how she tried to brainstorm with other researchers – only to be told that she should not “give away her departments’ secrets.
但我在那篇专栏文章中强调得不够的是,打破藩篱的努力可能不仅意味着创新。这些努力往往也可能造成一些讨厌的后果:颠覆原有的力量格局,或挑战传统的等级体系。因此,我遗憾地发现,在我收到的邮件中,举例说明打破藩篱带来益处的邮件只占少数,大多数邮件举出的例子都是令人灰心的。例如,美国有人试图改变市政府的运作模式,但却遭到工会的强烈反对。美国西海岸一所大学里的一名学者试图推动跨学科研究,他的出发点是好的,结果却发现这可能威胁到自己的终身教职评定。还有一封邮件来自一家大型制药公司的一名资深女研究员,她说自己试图与其他研究员自由讨论,结果却被告知不应该“泄露本部门的秘密。
【打破藩篱为何不受欢迎?】相关文章:
★ 人善被人欺?
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15