Yet the principle that had me throwing my hat in the air said leaders “are right, a lot.
不过,最让我为之振奋的原则是:领导“是正确的,在很多情况下。
To anyone not well schooled in corporate nonsense this might seem a bit obvious. But mostcompanies have so fallen for the trendy idea of “fail fast, fail often they have started to talk asif being wrong were superior to being right.
对于没接受过企业废话洗礼的人来说,这一条也许看起来有点显而易见。但是,大多数公司已经如此沉迷于“快速失败、经常失败这种新潮观点,以至于它们听上去仿佛是做错比做对更好。
So what are we to make of the fact that this company, which is so subversively sensible, is sohorrid to its workers? I have a nasty feeling the two things are connected. Amazon can affordto be honest because it isn’t trying to pretend to be nice. Founder Jeff Bezos has never hadany truck with cuddly: “Our culture is friendly and intense, but if push comes to shove we’llsettle for intense, he once said. The rest of the corporate world has built a business modelthat rests on the idea of happy workers.
那么,我们该如何理解一家颠覆性明智的公司对其员工如此可恶呢?我有种不好的感觉——这两件事是相互关联的。亚马逊能够做到坦诚,是因为它根本不试图假装亲善。亚马逊创始人杰夫·贝索斯 (Jeff Bezos)从不使用讨人欢心的把戏。他曾表示,“我们的文化是友善和紧张的,但在紧要关头,我们只能退而求其次地选择紧张。其他企业则构建了一种基于员工幸福的商业模式。
【亚马逊打破管理学谎言】相关文章:
最新
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15
2020-09-15