“苹果一直没有同意在这些设备上提供任何服务,”茨维林格写道。信中还表示,自去年12月起,苹果在多起案件中拒绝了司法部通过《所有令状法案》(All Writs Act)迫使其合作的要求。依据这项1789年的法案,法院可以要求当事人按其命令行事。
In the San Bernardino case, prosecutors have cast their demands for Apple to help them unlock the iPhone used by Syed Rizwan Farook — one of the attackers in the December rampage, in which 14 people were killed — as a limited effort in response to an unusual situation.
在圣贝纳迪那个案子中,检方把它对苹果公司提出的帮助解锁赛义德·里兹万·法鲁克(Syed Rizwan Farook)使用的iPhone的要求,描述为应对特殊情况的一种有限行为。法鲁克是去年12月致14人死亡的大规模枪击案的袭击者之一。
Still, “no one should be surprised that we’re investigating other cases and looking for assistance in those other cases,” a law enforcement official said on Tuesday.
不过,“我们也在调查其他案件,会在这些其他案件中要求协助,这不足为奇,”一名执法官员周二表示。
Since challenging a judge’s demand in the San Bernardino case, which called for Apple to create a special tool to help investigators more easily crack the phone’s passcode, the company has repeatedly asserted that such a move could not be done in isolation.
【美国政府要求苹果解锁更多iPhone】相关文章:
★ 印度版微信的颠覆性 Hike app aims to disrupt data providers
最新
2017-05-08
2017-02-10
2017-02-10
2016-11-03
2016-11-03
2016-11-03