Corporate governance is not yet a lost cause. Since Sir Adrian Cadbury’s committee produced its pioneering report in the UK in 1992, boards have become more professional. The ranks of shareholder activists are swelling, although many have a short-term focus. Conventional institutions are increasingly willing to oppose management on issues such as excessive pay.
然而,公司治理并非毫无希望。自从1992年阿德里安?卡德伯里爵士(Sir Adrian Cadbury)的委员会在英国发表那份开拓性的报告以来,董事会已变得更为专业。维权股东的行列在壮大,尽管很多人关注短线。传统机构越来越愿意在薪资过分等问题上反对管理层。
Yet in much of the world the system remains overdependent on a shrinking band of shareholders whose willingness and ability to hold management to account is questionable — or, as in the case of Snap, who are forcibly excluded from any stewardship role.
然而,在这个世界的很多地方,整个体制仍过于依赖一群日益减少的股东,而后者追究管理层责任的意愿和能力是带有问号的,或者就像在Snap的例子中,他们被排除在看管角色以外。
【股东vs管理层:公司治理谁说了算?】相关文章:
最新
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
2019-01-07
2019-01-05